Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 07:00

Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Microbiome: First bacteria we meet can keep us out of hospital - BBC
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Stock Market Today: Dow Futures Waver Ahead of U.S.-China Trade Talks — Live Updates - WSJ
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
What’s next?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Hollywood actress popular for hit ’70s shows dead at 95 - NJ.com
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Why did Microsoft acquire LinkedIn?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Thank you.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear: